Patient HRQoL was evaluated using the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI2/3)24 (link) and the SINDRA questionnaire at the study visit. Both questionnaires were addressed to patient’s caregivers. The HUI 2/3 consists of 15 questions evaluating the following attributes: vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognition, self-care, and pain. Each attribute is assigned a score on a 0 to 1 scale, with 0 corresponding to the worst health status and 1 corresponding to the best health status. In addition, an overall HUI score from − 0.371 to 1, where 0 corresponds to death, 1 represents perfect health, and negative scores are health states considered worse than dead. The SINDRA questionnaire was created ad hoc and consisted of 17 statements: seven related to patient functional skills, eight related to patient daily activities, and two related to caregivers’ work absence or work leave caused by patient caring. The SINDRA questionnaire is provided on Additional information. The impact of caregiving on patient’s caregivers was assessed with the care-related quality of life (CarerQoL) questionnaire25 at the study visit. The questionnaire consists of 7 items graded as “no”, “a little” or “a lot” regarding the description of the caregiving situation (CarerQol-7D) and the valuation of informal care in terms of well-being using a visual analogue scale (CarerQol-VAS) in which 0 is “completely unhappy” and 10 “completely happy”. The Spanish validation of the HUI 2/3 and the CarerQoL-7D questionnaires were used with permission. All the information was collected in a case report form by a healthcare professional.
Evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life in Epilepsy
Patient HRQoL was evaluated using the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI2/3)24 (link) and the SINDRA questionnaire at the study visit. Both questionnaires were addressed to patient’s caregivers. The HUI 2/3 consists of 15 questions evaluating the following attributes: vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognition, self-care, and pain. Each attribute is assigned a score on a 0 to 1 scale, with 0 corresponding to the worst health status and 1 corresponding to the best health status. In addition, an overall HUI score from − 0.371 to 1, where 0 corresponds to death, 1 represents perfect health, and negative scores are health states considered worse than dead. The SINDRA questionnaire was created ad hoc and consisted of 17 statements: seven related to patient functional skills, eight related to patient daily activities, and two related to caregivers’ work absence or work leave caused by patient caring. The SINDRA questionnaire is provided on Additional information. The impact of caregiving on patient’s caregivers was assessed with the care-related quality of life (CarerQoL) questionnaire25 at the study visit. The questionnaire consists of 7 items graded as “no”, “a little” or “a lot” regarding the description of the caregiving situation (CarerQol-7D) and the valuation of informal care in terms of well-being using a visual analogue scale (CarerQol-VAS) in which 0 is “completely unhappy” and 10 “completely happy”. The Spanish validation of the HUI 2/3 and the CarerQoL-7D questionnaires were used with permission. All the information was collected in a case report form by a healthcare professional.
Variable analysis
- Age at first seizure
- Age at diagnosis
- Seizure number
- Seizure severity
- Seizure type
- Status epilepticus
- Genetic tests
- Electroencephalogram (EEG)
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- Comorbidities
- Previous and current treatment (antiepileptic drugs and other therapies)
- Healthcare resource use (number of visits to physician and admissions to the emergency room or intensive care units [ICU] and attendance to day-care or a rehabilitation centre)
- Patient HRQoL evaluated using the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI2/3)
- Patient HRQoL evaluated using the SINDRA questionnaire
- Impact of caregiving on patient's caregivers assessed with the care-related quality of life (CarerQoL) questionnaire
- Independent variables not explicitly mentioned.
- Dependent variables not explicitly mentioned.
- Positive and negative controls not explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!