We defined three target populations for our analyses. The first is a nationally-representative sample of civilian, housed, noninstitutionalized adults with OUD identifying the need for treatment, as characterized by the NSDUH household 2018 and 2019 survey years [35 ]. Among all NSDUH respondents, we included those who had OUD, were age 18 or older, and (1) received treatment in the past year, but used nonprescribed opioids in the past month or (2) identified the need for, but had not received, treatment. The second target population was people receiving or planning to receive MOUD treatment, as captured in the 2018 TEDS admissions dataset [36 ]. Treatment episodes were included if the individual entering treatment met diagnostic criteria for OUD based off the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder—5th edition (DSM-5), used heroin or other illicit opioids in the past month, was 18 or older, and had MOUD as part of their intended treatment plan. The third target population was people who inject drugs or misuse opioids in rural areas of the U.S. as characterized by eight sites participating in the ROI [37 (link)]. Briefly, the ROI is a consortium of harmonized studies of people who use drugs in rural counties with high overdose rates covering ten states (Illinois, Kentucky, North Carolina, New England [Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont], Ohio, Oregon, West Virginia, Wisconsin). Inclusion criteria varied slightly by study site, but generally, people were eligible for the ROI cohort if they reported IDU or use of opioids to “get high” in the past month. ROI participants were included in this analysis if they were 18 or older and used opioids to get high in the past month. In order to meet positivity assumptions (i.e., to avoid generalizing to people who are strictly excluded from the source population of clinical trials), we also restricted all three target populations to individuals who were English-speaking, not currently pregnant, and without suicidal ideation.
Multisite CTN Trials for Opioid Use Disorder
We defined three target populations for our analyses. The first is a nationally-representative sample of civilian, housed, noninstitutionalized adults with OUD identifying the need for treatment, as characterized by the NSDUH household 2018 and 2019 survey years [35 ]. Among all NSDUH respondents, we included those who had OUD, were age 18 or older, and (1) received treatment in the past year, but used nonprescribed opioids in the past month or (2) identified the need for, but had not received, treatment. The second target population was people receiving or planning to receive MOUD treatment, as captured in the 2018 TEDS admissions dataset [36 ]. Treatment episodes were included if the individual entering treatment met diagnostic criteria for OUD based off the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder—5th edition (DSM-5), used heroin or other illicit opioids in the past month, was 18 or older, and had MOUD as part of their intended treatment plan. The third target population was people who inject drugs or misuse opioids in rural areas of the U.S. as characterized by eight sites participating in the ROI [37 (link)]. Briefly, the ROI is a consortium of harmonized studies of people who use drugs in rural counties with high overdose rates covering ten states (Illinois, Kentucky, North Carolina, New England [Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont], Ohio, Oregon, West Virginia, Wisconsin). Inclusion criteria varied slightly by study site, but generally, people were eligible for the ROI cohort if they reported IDU or use of opioids to “get high” in the past month. ROI participants were included in this analysis if they were 18 or older and used opioids to get high in the past month. In order to meet positivity assumptions (i.e., to avoid generalizing to people who are strictly excluded from the source population of clinical trials), we also restricted all three target populations to individuals who were English-speaking, not currently pregnant, and without suicidal ideation.
Corresponding Organization : Oregon Health & Science University
Other organizations : University of California, Los Angeles, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Center for Innovation, Columbia University, University of Washington
Variable analysis
- Treatment assignment (XR-NTX vs. sublingual buprenorphine in X:BOT, XR-NTX vs. treatment as usual in CHOICES)
- Urine drug screen (UDS) data
- Harmonized questionnaire data
- Clinical, pharmacy, or laboratory data
- Inclusion criteria: English-speaking, not currently pregnant, and without suicidal ideation
- None specified
- None specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!