Comprehensive Profiling of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
This study included five ICC patient cohorts. (1) The FU-iCCA cohort enrolled 262 ICC patients from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University [22 (link)]. Multi-omics data of this cohort, including data of whole-exome sequencing (WES), RNA sequencing, and proteome, were analyzed. (2) The second cohort recruited 259 patients with pathologically confirmed ICC undergoing curative resection in Zhongshan Hospital (ZSH cohort) from June 2012 to December 2017. All enrolled patients received no anti-cancer therapy prior to surgery. All tumor specimens from the ZSH cohort were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded and collected for tissue microarrays (TMA) construction. The ZSH cohort was used to validate the findings from the FU-iCCA cohort. The baseline characteristics of the FU-iCCA cohort and the ZSH cohort are detailed in Table 1. Serological tests were performed within 3 days before the operation. The clinical stage was evaluated based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition [23 (link)]. (3) The third cohort included five ICC patients from the single-cell RNA sequencing dataset GSE138709 [24 (link)]. (4) We extracted the single-cell data of ten ICC patients for the immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) clinical trial (ICB cohort) from GSE151530 and divided them into two groups (baseline group and ICB-treated group) [25 (link)]. (5) The fifth cohort recruited an independent cohort of 33 ICC patients receiving surgical resection from January 2019 to June 2019 in Zhongshan Hospital. CD73 expression between matched tumor and para-tumor tissues was compared by RT-PCR assays.
Correlation between CD73 expression and clinical features of patients enrolled
Characteristics
FU-iCCA cohort (n = 244)
ZSH cohort (n = 259)
Patients
CD73 expression
Patients
CD73 expression
No
%
Low
High
P value
No
%
Low
High
P value
All patients
244
100
140
104
259
100
146
113
Sex
Female
106
43.4
62
44
0.758
99
38.2
67
32
0.004
Male
138
56.6
78
60
160
61.8
79
81
Age
≤ 60
113
46.3
67
46
0.574
125
48.3
69
56
0.714
> 60
131
53.7
73
58
134
51.7
77
57
HBsAg
Negative
179
73.4
104
75
0.705
179
69.1
97
82
0.290
Positive
65
26.6
36
29
80
30.9
49
31
Liver cirrhosis
No
222
91.0
128
94
0.778
186
71.8
104
82
0.813
Yes
22
9.0
12
10
73
28.2
42
31
Vascular invasion
No
141
57.8
87
54
0.110
185
71.4
115
70
0.003
Yes
103
42.2
53
50
74
28.6
31
43
LN metastasis
No
194
79.5
114
80
0.389
207
79.9
124
83
0.022
Yes
50
20.5
26
24
52
20.1
22
30
Tumor size
≤ 5 cm
108
44.3
63
45
0.788
116
44.8
71
45
0.158
> 5 cm
136
55.7
77
59
143
55.2
75
68
CA199
≤ 37 U/mL
109
44.7
75
34
0.001
116
44.8
76
40
0.008
> 37 U/mL
135
55.3
65
70
143
55.2
70
73
CEA
≤ 5 ng/mL
185
75.8
116
69
0.003
189
73.0
118
71
0.001
> 5 ng/mL
59
24.2
24
35
70
27.0
28
42
AJCC 8th
I–II
154
63.1
96
58
0.040
203
78.4
122
81
0.021
III–IV
90
36.9
44
46
56
21.6
24
32
Data in bold indicated statistical significance
ZSH cohort Zhongshan Hospital cohort, LN Lymph node, CEA Carcinoembryonic antigen, AJCC American Joint Committee on Cancer
Sun B.Y., Yang Z.F., Wang Z.T., Liu G., Zhou C., Zhou J., Fan J., Gan W., Yi Y, & Qiu S.J. (2023). Integrative analyses identify CD73 as a prognostic biomarker and immunotherapeutic target in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 21, 90.
Correlation with clinical features of ICC patients
Comparison of CD73 expression between matched tumor and para-tumor tissues
control variables
No anti-cancer therapy prior to surgery for the ZSH cohort
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required