Protocol detail

Maternal COVID-19 Anxiety Questionnaire

Find Similar Protocols

This questionnaire consists of five items that evaluate maternal anxiety concerning COVID-19 infection to self and baby as well as pregnancy complications such as miscarriage, fetal anomaly, and preterm birth. This questionnaire demonstrated good internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha of 0.928 (21 (link)). The total score ranged between 5 to 25, and a 50% cut-off level (score ≥13) indicates greater maternal anxiety.

Free full text: Click here

Kalok A., Razak Dali W., Sharip S., Abdullah B., Kamarudin M., Dasrilsyah R.A., Abdul Rahman R, & Kamisan Atan I. (2023). Maternal COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among Malaysian pregnant women: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1092724.

Publication 2023

Anxiety Baby Covid 19 infection Fetal anomaly Maternal Miscarriage Pregnancy complications Pregnancy miscarriage Preterm birth

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Not explicitly mentioned

dependent variables

Maternal anxiety concerning COVID-19 infection to self
Maternal anxiety concerning COVID-19 infection to baby
Maternal anxiety concerning pregnancy complications such as miscarriage, fetal anomaly, and preterm birth

control variables

Not explicitly mentioned

controls

No positive or negative controls were mentioned in the provided information.

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!