Research questions were informed by consultation with many Every Newborn stakeholders [9 ,17 (link)] including WHO-led Measurement Improvement Roadmap meeting [15 ] and EN-BIRTH Expert Advisory Group (listed as author group). More than 60 participants in an EN-BIRTH study design workshop [49 ] provided representation from country partners, national stakeholders, UN agencies, leading academic and professional experts in the field, governmental and non-governmental organisations, clinicians, program managers, other key experts and donors (see Appendix S1 in
Validating Maternal and Newborn Indicators
Research questions were informed by consultation with many Every Newborn stakeholders [9 ,17 (link)] including WHO-led Measurement Improvement Roadmap meeting [15 ] and EN-BIRTH Expert Advisory Group (listed as author group). More than 60 participants in an EN-BIRTH study design workshop [49 ] provided representation from country partners, national stakeholders, UN agencies, leading academic and professional experts in the field, governmental and non-governmental organisations, clinicians, program managers, other key experts and donors (see Appendix S1 in
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Uppsala University, Pokhara University, Department of Health Services, Nepal Health Research Council, Kanti Children's Hospital, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Karolinska Institutet, Johns Hopkins University, United Nations Children's Fund, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, United Nations Population Fund, World Health Organization, United States Agency for International Development, University of Oslo, Save the Children
Protocol cited in 7 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Routine facility registers
- Maternal recall surveys
- Coverage indicators of selected maternal and newborn interventions
- Direct observation (gold standard)
- Positive control: Direct observation (gold standard)
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!