Antibodies used were: CD4 (BV510, 1:400, clone RM4–5), CD8 (PerCP-cy5.5, 1:200, clone 53–6.7), FOXP3 (BV421, 1:100, clone MF-14), all acquired from BioLegend® Inc. (San Diego, CA); and CD45 (PE-cy7, 1:200, clone 30-F11), CD3 (FITC, 1:200, clone 17A2), both acquired from Tonbo Biosciences.
Quantifying Immune Cell Profiles in Intracranial Melanoma
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : University of Wisconsin–Madison, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center
Variable analysis
- Animal studies
- Intracranial melanoma tumors
- Immune cell populations
- Minimum of three samples
- Two independent animal studies
- Dissected intracranial melanoma tumors physically dissociated and filtered through a 70-μm cell filter
- Single cells labeled with primary antibody
- Cells without primary antibody labeling used as unlabeled negative controls
- Fluorescent beads (UltraComp eBeads™, Invitrogen™, Carlsbad, CA) used as positive/calibration controls and to determine compensation between fluorescent channels
- Forward- and side-scatter gating identified single cells and viable cell (Ghost Dye™ Red 780 Viability Dye, 1:100; Tonbo Biosciences, San Diego, CA) exclusion identified live cells
- Fluorescence minus one (FMO) methodology used to determine gating
- Flow cytometry performed on an Attune NxT Flow Cytometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific™ Inc., Waltham, MA), and compensation matrix computed and data analyzed using FlowJo version 9 software (Ashland, OR) following published flow cytometry guidelines (45 (link))
- Antibodies used: CD4 (BV510, 1:400, clone RM4–5), CD8 (PerCP-cy5.5, 1:200, clone 53–6.7), FOXP3 (BV421, 1:100, clone MF-14), all acquired from BioLegend® Inc. (San Diego, CA); and CD45 (PE-cy7, 1:200, clone 30-F11), CD3 (FITC, 1:200, clone 17A2), both acquired from Tonbo Biosciences
- Fluorescent beads (UltraComp eBeads™, Invitrogen™, Carlsbad, CA) used as positive/calibration controls and to determine compensation between fluorescent channels
- Cells without primary antibody labeling used as unlabeled negative controls
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!