Evaluating Fetal Arrhythmia: Comprehensive Approach

Following a diagnosis of fetal arrhythmia, TORCH (toxoplasmosis, other [syphilis], rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus) and thyroid function were evaluated in maternal peripheral blood. Pregnant women with fetal arrhythmia were hospitalized so that they could be more closely observed for signs of fetal compromise or distress. Early delivery was considered and weighed against the complications of prematurity and fetal status in utero.

Free full text: Click here

Hu Q., Liao H., Xu T., Liu H., Wang X, & Yu H. (2023). Perinatal outcomes of intrauterine fetal arrhythmias: A 10-year retrospective cohort study. Medicine, 102(10), e33244.

Publication 2023

Arrhythmia Blood Cytomegalovirus Delivery Fetal Fetal diagnosis Herpes simplex virus Maternal Pregnant women Prematurity Rubella Syphilis Thyroid Toxoplasmosis Utero

Corresponding Organization : Sichuan University

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Diagnosis of fetal arrhythmia

dependent variables

Signs of fetal compromise or distress
Complications of prematurity and fetal status in utero

control variables

Maternal peripheral blood for TORCH and thyroid function evaluation
Hospitalization of pregnant women with fetal arrhythmia for closer observation

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!