Aerodynamic Characterization of Inhaler Formulations
DD and FPD were determined by using the sampling apparatus and procedures described in European Pharmacopoeia 8.0; for each flow rate evaluated, 4 L of air was drawn through the inhaler.(24 )Salmeterol and Fluticasone propionate collected in the sampling apparatus were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography method with UV detection at 280 nm. The chromatographic separations were carried out at 40°C on an Inertsil ODS-3 C18, 3 μm, 4.0 × 150 mm analytical column (GL Sciences) using 100 μL injection volume. The mobile phase, methanol:0.02 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.2 (25:75), was delivered at a flow rate 1 mL/mL. The samples were dissolved in water:acetonitrile 50:50 (v/v) and sample volume was 50 mL for DD samples and varied from 10 to 65 mL for FPD samples. The quantitation limit of the method for Salmeterol was 0.03 μg/mL and for Fluticasone Propionate, 0.1 μg/mL. The relative standard deviation of the peak areas varied not more than 2% during analysis. For assessments of DD, a total of 36 devices were tested (three devices for each flow rate and strength/batch). Ten doses were measured for each inhaler, and the mean DDs were calculated. FPD was defined as the amount of particles with an aerodynamic diameter ≤5 μm. FPD was determined using Next Generation Impactor (NGI, apparatus E).(24 ) The cutoff points for impactor stages were calculated in relationship to the used flow rates according to European Pharmacopoeia 8.0,(24 ) and FPD was derived from the data. For each FPD analysis, 10 doses were discharged into the NGI.
Jõgi R., Lähelmä S., Vahteristo M., Happonen A, & Haikarainen J. (2019). In Vitro Flow Rate Dependency of Delivered Dose and Fine Particle Dose of Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate Easyhaler and Seretide Diskus with Patient Flow Rates Collected in a Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery, 32(2), 88-98.
Relative standard deviation of peak areas (not more than 2%)
controls
Positive control: Not specified
Negative control: Not specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required