Categorical variables were described as proportions and percentages. Continuous variables were described as mean and standard deviations. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-squared test and continuous variables using independent Student’s t-test. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for in-hospital mortality and severity of IBD. Linear regression models were constructed to estimate the effect of CMV infection on length of hospital stay and total charges of IBD-related hospitalization. Multivariate models were adjusted for all the factors associated with CMV infection at a P value < 0.2 on the univariate analysis. Least square regression analysis was used for trend analysis of CMV infection over the years. SPSS 26 was used for statistical analysis.
Protocol detail
CMV Infection Impact on IBD Outcomes
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, Case Western Reserve University, Rush University Medical Center
Top 5 similar protocols
Variable analysis
independent variables
- CMV infection
- In-hospital mortality
- Severity of IBD
- Length of hospital stay
- Total charges of IBD-related hospitalization
- Factors associated with CMV infection at a P value < 0.2 on the univariate analysis
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
Sign up for free or login to display all annotations
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!