CRISPR-Cas9 Cutting Efficiency Analysis
Corresponding Organization : Hubrecht Institute for Developmental Biology and Stem Cell Research
Other organizations : Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Variable analysis
- Filtering of sequencing reads to remove low-quality (Illumina average quality <28) or unmapped reads
- Fractions of insertions and deletions of all lengths computed from the two replicates
- Indel and 1-bp insertion detection at native human genomic loci
- Use of published analysis pipeline described in Shen et al. 12 (link)
- Use of Crispresso2 with default parameters and a Needleman Wunsch gap extended score of 0 for optimal alignment with visual inspection39 (link)
- Positive control: Not explicitly mentioned
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!