Z-scored SDMs were generated from rapid TR fMRI scans in a similar manner as those obtained with slower TRs. Z-scores for each frequency band were generated by subtracting the mean voxel-wise power for the midline sagittal slice and dividing by the standard deviation. Subject z-score maps were averaged using a fixed-effects model to create group level z-statistic maps. BOLD signal significantly affected by physiological noise was determined by observing the distribution of power around frequency bands known to be associated with cardiorespiratory activity and showing relevant peaks for the group average midline slice BOLD frequency spectrum (0.2–0.4 Hz, and 0.75–1.5 Hz). Regions exceeding z>2.3 for these frequency bands were masked from further analysis of the midline slice. The group average z-score distribution for the slow fMRI data set was obtained using the same mask. BOLD SDMs of the right leg were made in an identical manner to the brain SDMs, without physiologic correction.
Mapping Brain Dynamics with Physio-Corrected fMRI
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Northwestern University
Other organizations : University Radiology
Protocol cited in 6 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Cardiorespiratory activity
- Distribution of frequency band power for the entire brain
- Z-scored SDMs generated from rapid TR fMRI scans
- BOLD signal significantly affected by physiological noise
- Midline sagittal slice
- Frequency bands known to be associated with cardiorespiratory activity (0.2–0.4 Hz, and 0.75–1.5 Hz)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!