EHdn supports case-control and outlier analyses of the underlying dataset. The case-control analysis is based on a one-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test. It is appropriate for situations where a significant subset of cases is expected to contain expansions of the same repeat. The outlier analysis is appropriate for heterogeneous cohorts where enrichment for any specific expansion is not expected. The outlier analysis bootstraps the sampling distribution of the 95% quantile and then calculates the z-scores for cases that exceed the mean of this distribution. The z-scores are used for ranking the repeat regions. Similar outlier-detection frameworks were also developed for exSTRa [23 (link)] and STRetch [25 (link)]. Both the case-control and the outlier analyses can be applied either to the counts of anchored IRRs or to the counts of paired IRRs. We refer to these as locus or motif methods, respectively. The high-ranking regions flagged by the analysis of anchored IRRs correspond to approximate locations of putative repeat expansions. The high-ranking motifs flagged by the analysis of paired IRRs correspond to the overall enrichment for repeats with that motif.
Dolzhenko E., Bennett M.F., Richmond P.A., Trost B., Chen S., van Vugt J.J., Nguyen C., Narzisi G., Gainullin V.G., Gross A.M., Lajoie B.R., Taft R.J., Wasserman W.W., Scherer S.W., Veldink J.H., Bentley D.R., Yuen R.K., Bahlo M, & Eberle M.A. (2020). ExpansionHunter Denovo: a computational method for locating known and novel repeat expansions in short-read sequencing data. Genome Biology, 21, 102.
Publication 2020
Heterogeneous Irrs
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations :
Illumina (United States), Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, British Columbia Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Hospital for Sick Children, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, New York Genome Center, Illumina (United Kingdom), University of Melbourne
Outlier analysis (bootstrapping and z-score calculation)
dependent variables
Repeat expansions
Enrichment for specific repeat expansions
control variables
Not explicitly mentioned
controls
Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required