Models were validated with specimens from a separate group of long-term daily cannabis smokers (reporting ≥5000 lifetime episodes of cannabis use) who were engaged in an outpatient research study evaluating neurocognitive performance during extended drug abstinence (16 (link)). This study was approved by the McLean Hospital and NIDA IRBs; written informed consent was obtained from all participants after a complete description of the study. These participants agreed to maintain cannabis abstinence for 28 days, with compliance evaluated by urine CN-THCCOOH concentrations in daily urine specimens collected under direct observation. The ratio of Specimen 2/Specimen 1 normalized concentrations was determined; a 50% increase (ratio of 1.5) compared to the preceding concentration indicated new cannabis use. Participants were not currently taking psychoactive medications and had ≤100 lifetime cocaine, stimulant, opioid, sedative-hypnotic, hallucinogen and inhalant uses.
Validating Cannabis Abstinence Monitoring Models
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Harvard University
Protocol cited in 10 other protocols
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- THCCOOH concentrations in urine
- Physical and psychological health of participants verified by medical history, physical examination, psychological tests, ECG, CBC, blood chemistries, and urinalysis
- All belongings searched prior to unit entry
- No visitors allowed
- Participants resided continuously on the closed clinical research unit for up to 30 days
- Participants were not currently taking psychoactive medications and had ≤100 lifetime cocaine, stimulant, opioid, sedative-hypnotic, hallucinogen and inhalant uses
- None explicitly mentioned
- None explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!