Literature searches were performed in Web of Science (http://wok.mimas.ac.uk/) and PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) to identify publications in the public domain in the following areas relevant to the developing infant.
Toxicology
Nutritional needs
Physiological and biochemical considerations
— Physiology of the gut
— Metabolic and excretory capacities relevant for the elimination of chemicals
— The nervous system, including brain and brain barriers
— The immune system
— The male and female reproductive systems
— The endocrine system
Comprehensive reviews covering the above areas were identified in order to recognise recent developments since the latest comprehensive assessments of infant toxicology and development by national and international authorities and agencies. The periods covered ranged from January 2012 to February 2016 and the searches were performed in Web of Science. The search limits were document type = review and search terms in title. The search terms combined were ‘intestin*’ OR ‘gastro*’ AND ‘development*’ OR ‘infant’ OR ‘neonat*’ (retrieved 98; selected 5); ‘metabolism’ OR ‘cytochrome’ OR ‘CYP*’ OR ‘glucuronidation’ OR ‘glucuronosyl*’ OR ‘sulfation’ OR ‘sulphation’ OR ‘sulfonyl*’ OR sulphonyl*’ OR ‘acetylation’ OR ‘conjugation’ OR ‘glutathione OR ‘transporter’ or ‘clearance’ OR ‘ADME’ AND ‘development*’ OR ‘ontogeny’ OR ‘infant’ OR ‘neonat*’ (retrieved 121; selected 10); ‘brain’ AND ‘development*’ OR ‘infant’ OR ‘neonat*’ (retrieved 256; selected 21); ‘immun*’ AND ‘development*’ OR ‘infant’ OR ‘neonat*’ (retrieved 289; selected 14); ‘reproduct*’ OR ‘gonad*’ OR ‘sexua*’ OR ‘endocrin*’ AND ‘development*’ OR ‘infant’ OR ‘neonat*’ (retrieved 105; selected 25). The selection criteria included coverage of the perinatal or post‐natal period and relevance to the assessment. Additional primary references of particular relevance were identified by the working group members (up to May 2016). In addition, publicly available guidance documents and reports produced by committees and international authorities such as the Joint FAO‐WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), Scientific Committee on Food (SCF), EFSA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) that were relevant to risk assessment of substances in food intended for infants were considered. A draft of this document Guidance underwent a public consultation from 20 February to 31 March 2017. The comments received were considered and have been incorporated where appropriate.
Hardy A., Benford D., Halldorsson T., Jeger M.J., Knutsen H.K., More S., Naegeli H., Noteborn H., Ockleford C., Ricci A., Rychen G., Schlatter J.R., Silano V., Solecki R., Turck D., Bresson J., Dusemund B., Gundert‐Remy U., Kersting M., Lambré C., Penninks A., Tritscher A., Waalkens‐Berendsen I., Woutersen R., Arcella D., Court Marques D., Dorne J., Kass G.E, & Mortensen A. (2017). Guidance on the risk assessment of substances present in food intended for infants below 16 weeks of age. EFSA Journal, 15(5), e04849.
Literature searches performed in Web of Science and PubMed
dependent variables
Relevant publications in the public domain in the areas of toxicology, nutritional needs, and physiological and biochemical considerations for the developing infant
control variables
The search periods ranged from January 2012 to February 2016 and February 2017 to March 2017 (for the public consultation)
The search limits were document type = review and search terms in title
The search terms combined were 'intestin*' OR 'gastro*' AND 'development*' OR 'infant' OR 'neonat*'
'metabolism' OR 'cytochrome' OR 'CYP*' OR 'glucuronidation' OR 'glucuronosyl*' OR 'sulfation' OR 'sulphation' OR 'sulfonyl*' OR sulphonyl*' OR 'acetylation' OR 'conjugation' OR 'glutathione OR 'transporter' or 'clearance' OR 'ADME' AND 'development*' OR 'ontogeny' OR 'infant' OR 'neonat*'
'brain' AND 'development*' OR 'infant' OR 'neonat*'
'immun*' AND 'development*' OR 'infant' OR 'neonat*'
'reproduct*' OR 'gonad*' OR 'sexua*' OR 'endocrin*' AND 'development*' OR 'infant' OR 'neonat*'
controls
No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required