This study was approved by the Hebei Yanda Lu Daopei Hospital Ethics Committee and informed consent was obtained from all participants before any study procedures were conducted. It was organized as a retrospective review study and Figure 1 illustrates the research design. A total of 3395 patients who had received allo-HSCT from January 2013 to December 2019 in this hospital were identified. The MRD of these patients was analyzed by two-tube, eight-color MFC panel. Three groups of patients who underwent bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB) immunophenotyping for non-malignant diseases at Hebei Yanda Lu Daopei Hospital were also identified. The first group included 5256 participants and the presence of CD16 expression in granulocytes was determined. The second group included 2000 participants who were screened for natural killer (NK) or T-cells for further immunophenotype analysis of NK lymphoma. The third group included 1100 participants over 35 years of age with non-neoplastic diseases who underwent screening of plasma and B cells.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Wang H., Wang A., Chen M., Gong M., Wu X., Zhen J, & Lu Y. (2023). Abnormalities by Multicolor Flow Cytometry for Detection of Minimal Residual Disease in Recipients of Allo-HSCT Originating from Donors: A Cohort Study. Turkish Journal of Hematology, 40(1), 18-27.
Publication 2023
B cellsBone marrow Granulocytes Hospital ethics committee ImmunophenotypeLymphoma Natural killer t cells Neoplastic diseasesPatients Peripheral blood diseasesPlasma
Corresponding Organization : Beijing Dao Pei Hospital
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) of patients who had received allo-HSCT
CD16 expression in granulocytes
Natural killer (NK) or T-cells for further immunophenotype analysis of NK lymphoma
Plasma and B cells in participants over 35 years of age with non-neoplastic diseases
control variables
None explicitly mentioned
controls
Positive control: None mentioned
Negative control: None mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required