Sciatic Nerve Injury and Repair Evaluation
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : The University of Texas at Austin
Other organizations : Texas A&M University, Vanderbilt University
Protocol cited in 4 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Potential lesion site
- Compound action potentials (CAPs) conduction through the lesion site
- Stimulating and recording tungsten hook electrodes placed on or under the sciatic nerve
- Time of stimulation after PEG-fusion (typically within minutes)
- Positive control: Intact sciatic nerves with confirmed CAPs conduction across potential lesion site
- Negative control: Complete crush- or cut-severances with inability to record CAP conduction through the severance site
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!