All the above-mentioned samples (leaf petioles or bark scrapings) were subjected to TNA extraction: 0.2 g plant tissue was homogenized in 2 ml of guanidine isothiocyanate lysis buffer (4 M guanidine isothiocyanate; 0.2 M sodium acetate, pH 5.0; 2 mM EDTA; 2.5% (w/v) PVP-40) and TNA extracts were prepared using a MagMAX-96 viral RNA isolation kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) as per the manufacturer’s protocol. Subsequently, the integrity of RNA was verified using an 18S rRNA assay [18 (link)].
Comprehensive Grapevine Virus Screening
All the above-mentioned samples (leaf petioles or bark scrapings) were subjected to TNA extraction: 0.2 g plant tissue was homogenized in 2 ml of guanidine isothiocyanate lysis buffer (4 M guanidine isothiocyanate; 0.2 M sodium acetate, pH 5.0; 2 mM EDTA; 2.5% (w/v) PVP-40) and TNA extracts were prepared using a MagMAX-96 viral RNA isolation kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) as per the manufacturer’s protocol. Subsequently, the integrity of RNA was verified using an 18S rRNA assay [18 (link)].
Corresponding Organization : National Clonal Germplasm Repository
Protocol cited in 7 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Grapevine populations with a historically high incidence of GLRaV-3 or with observable GLD symptoms
- Plant samples collected from different geographic locations and sources (USDA National Clonal Germplasm Repository, Davis Virus Collection, FPS pipeline, vineyards in California, and other GLRaV-3 collections outside the USA)
- Presence/absence of GLRaV-3 infection in the collected plant samples
- Positive controls (described above) included during the testing process
- A grapevine that tested negative by HTS for viruses and virus-like pathogens
- The protocol does not explicitly mention independent or dependent variables, but they can be inferred from the context. The control variables are clearly specified in the protocol.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!