For two-photon imaging, ex vivo mouse eyes were labeled intact, without dissection or sectioning, with Sulforhodamine-B (Thermo Fisher Scientific), a water soluble stain of elastic microfibrils. Microscopy was performed on a Leica SP5 microscope (Leica Microsystems, Heidelberg, Germany) coupled to a Chameleon Ultra-II multiphoton laser (Coherent, Santa Clara, CA) through inverted 20X/0.7NA or 63X/1.3NA objectives. We used 850 nm excitation, pulsed, and focused through green (525/50 nm) or red (585/40 nm) filters (Chroma, Bellows Falls, VT) onto a non-descanned photomultiplier tube detector (Hamamatsu, Bridgewater, NJ). Images were collected as multiple channel z-stacks using 512 × 512 or 1024 × 1024 pixel frames, 16-bit grayscale resolution, and 16X line averaging using 1–8 μm step sizes. Images were viewed and processed on LAS AF and AF Lite 2.2.1 (Leica), Image J (NIH; Bethesda, MD), Photoshop CS5 (Adobe, San Jose, CA) and Imaris (Oxford Instruments). Methods reported here have previously been described101 (link), 106 (link)–108 (link).
Elastic Microfibril Visualization in Ocular Tissues
For two-photon imaging, ex vivo mouse eyes were labeled intact, without dissection or sectioning, with Sulforhodamine-B (Thermo Fisher Scientific), a water soluble stain of elastic microfibrils. Microscopy was performed on a Leica SP5 microscope (Leica Microsystems, Heidelberg, Germany) coupled to a Chameleon Ultra-II multiphoton laser (Coherent, Santa Clara, CA) through inverted 20X/0.7NA or 63X/1.3NA objectives. We used 850 nm excitation, pulsed, and focused through green (525/50 nm) or red (585/40 nm) filters (Chroma, Bellows Falls, VT) onto a non-descanned photomultiplier tube detector (Hamamatsu, Bridgewater, NJ). Images were collected as multiple channel z-stacks using 512 × 512 or 1024 × 1024 pixel frames, 16-bit grayscale resolution, and 16X line averaging using 1–8 μm step sizes. Images were viewed and processed on LAS AF and AF Lite 2.2.1 (Leica), Image J (NIH; Bethesda, MD), Photoshop CS5 (Adobe, San Jose, CA) and Imaris (Oxford Instruments). Methods reported here have previously been described101 (link), 106 (link)–108 (link).
Corresponding Organization : University of California, Los Angeles
Other organizations : Doheny Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, University of Southern California, California State University, Northridge
Variable analysis
- Elastic microfibril staining method using Verhoeff van Gieson Elastic Stain Kit
- Two-photon microscopy imaging with Sulforhodamine-B staining
- Identification and analysis of elastic microfibrils in whole eye cross-sections
- Visualization of elastic microfibrils in ex vivo mouse eyes using two-photon microscopy
- Manufacturer's protocol for Verhoeff van Gieson Elastic Stain Kit
- Microscope settings and parameters (Leica SP5 microscope, Chameleon Ultra-II multiphoton laser, objectives, filters, detectors, image resolution, step sizes, etc.)
- Positive control: Not explicitly mentioned
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!