For detection of LIBS epitopes, cells were washed and suspended in FACS saline buffer and then incubated for 15 min with various concentrations of cyclic RGD peptide, reactive with integrins αvβ3 and αvβ5 (Goodman et al., 2002 (link)). Cells were then incubated with RabMabs in the presence of the peptide; the washing, staining, and flow-cytometry procedure was done as described above.
Flow Cytometry-based Integrin Assessment
For detection of LIBS epitopes, cells were washed and suspended in FACS saline buffer and then incubated for 15 min with various concentrations of cyclic RGD peptide, reactive with integrins αvβ3 and αvβ5 (Goodman et al., 2002 (link)). Cells were then incubated with RabMabs in the presence of the peptide; the washing, staining, and flow-cytometry procedure was done as described above.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Merck (Germany)
Protocol cited in 4 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Concentration of cyclic RGD peptide
- Mean intensity of fluorescence (MIF) of cells stained with antibodies, expressed as the ratio to the MIF of the negative control
- Harvesting of cells using trypsin (0.5 µg/ml)/EDTA (0.2 µg/ml), which did not affect expression of the integrins
- Washing of cells in FACs saline buffer (PBS; 0.9 mM CaCl2; 0.5 mM MgCl2; 0.5% w/v BSA)
- Incubation of cells with antibody diluted in FACs buffer (1 µg/ml; 60 min; 4°C)
- Staining of cells using Alexa488 labeled goat-anti-rabbit IgG (30 min; 4°C)
- Flow-cytometry collecting 20000 events
- Murine anti-integrin antibodies used under identical conditions (but at 10 µg/ml)
- The EM00212 antibody against the β3 cytoplasmic domain, which does not recognize its epitope on viable cells, used as the isotype matched RabMab control
- Cells stained with PI, with an isotype matched control, and secondary labeled antibody, used as the negative control for MIF
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!