Prior to image review, all testers read images from the same 20 patients to check inter-observer agreement. The average Kappa coefficient of inter-observer agreement was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.71–0.81). Kappa values 0.00–0.20 were considered to indicate slight agreement; 0.21–0.40, fair agreement; 0.41–0.60, moderate agreement; 0.61–0.80, substantial agreement; and 0.811.00, almost perfect agreement [17 (link)]. Therefore, this finding indicates substantial agreement and consistency with the results of the previous study [9 (link)]. We also evaluated the degree of OPLL occupying the cervical spinal canal, with classification of the canal narrowing ratio (CNR) [18 (link)] at the most compressed segment defined as follows: Grade 1, 0% < CNR ≤ 25%; Grade 2, 25% < CNR ≤ 50%; Grade 3, 50% < CNR ≤ 75%; and Grade 4, CNR > 75%. First, we compared male and female populations in terms of the physical and radiologic data. We next evaluated the usefulness of the cervical OP-index classification for predicting the presence of OPLL in the thoracolumbar spine. Finally, we used a multiple regression model to investigate the factors associated with the OP-index in all patients.
Cervical Ossification Index for OPLL Evaluation
Prior to image review, all testers read images from the same 20 patients to check inter-observer agreement. The average Kappa coefficient of inter-observer agreement was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.71–0.81). Kappa values 0.00–0.20 were considered to indicate slight agreement; 0.21–0.40, fair agreement; 0.41–0.60, moderate agreement; 0.61–0.80, substantial agreement; and 0.811.00, almost perfect agreement [17 (link)]. Therefore, this finding indicates substantial agreement and consistency with the results of the previous study [9 (link)]. We also evaluated the degree of OPLL occupying the cervical spinal canal, with classification of the canal narrowing ratio (CNR) [18 (link)] at the most compressed segment defined as follows: Grade 1, 0% < CNR ≤ 25%; Grade 2, 25% < CNR ≤ 50%; Grade 3, 50% < CNR ≤ 75%; and Grade 4, CNR > 75%. First, we compared male and female populations in terms of the physical and radiologic data. We next evaluated the usefulness of the cervical OP-index classification for predicting the presence of OPLL in the thoracolumbar spine. Finally, we used a multiple regression model to investigate the factors associated with the OP-index in all patients.
Corresponding Organization : University of Toyama
Protocol cited in 5 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Presence of diabetes
- Body mass index (BMI)
- Incidence of OPLL in the cervical spine
- Incidence of OPLL in other spinal regions
- Ossification index (OP-index)
- Cervical OP-index
- Cervical OA-index
- Canal narrowing ratio (CNR)
- None explicitly mentioned
- Positive control: None mentioned
- Negative control: None mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!