PET Phantom Imaging Protocol for 90Y Quantification
Data were acquired on a variety of PET scanners (Table 1) from the major vendors, with a number of different reconstructions from systems equipped both with and without time of flight (ToF) and resolution recovery (RR). Each site followed an identical experimental protocol utilizing the NEMA 2007/IEC 2008 PET Body Phantom (Data Spectrum Corporation, NC), with a volume of about 10 L containing a “cold” (nonradioactive) solid insert (diameter 51 mm) and six fillable spheres of various diameters (∅ 10, 13, 17, 22, 28 and 37 mm) filled to an approximate eight-to-one sphere-to-background ratio with 90Y-chloride (YCl3) provided in a constant specific activity (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA).
The scanners contributing data to the study according to vendor and model (all scanners equipped with standard reconstruction corrections for attenuation, scatter and random events)
Vendor
Model
Crystal material
Additional corrections
Number of scanners
Number of reconstructions
GE Healthcare
Discovery 690, 710
LYSO
ToF, RR
9
21
Discovery 600, Discovery ST (E)
BGO
With or without RR
9
16
Discovery RX
LYSO
–
3
7
Philips
Gemini TF
LYSO
ToF, RR
9
9
Siemens
Biograph mCT
LSO
ToF, RR
19a
28
Biograph (various)
LSO
With or without RR
19
28
ToF’ time-of-flight, RR’ resolution recovery (point spread function recovery)
aIncluding two systems with the new continuous bed motion technology
Each site was required to measure the phantom volume and the delivered 90Y solution in the departmental dose calibrator for comparison with the shipping certificate. The entire delivery vial was added to a volume of 1,300 ml, and this solution was used to fill the phantom spheres, before the reminder of solution was added to the background compartment, with the addition of EDTA/DTPA to the contents to prevent the YCl3 sticking to the phantom walls. This allowed an eight-to-one sphere-to-background ratio, in keeping with the NEMA NU 2-2007 [24 ] image quality guidelines, and was thought to require minimal phantom manipulation and activity handling at sites. Residual in the vial was estimated through re-measuring the vial in the dose calibrator after reconstitution to the initial volume with water. Residual in the needle and syringe was taken as negligible.
Willowson K.P., Tapner M, & Bailey D.L. (2015). A multicentre comparison of quantitative 90Y PET/CT for dosimetric purposes after radioembolization with resin microspheres: The QUEST Phantom Study. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 42(8), 1202-1222.
Publication 2015
Body Chloride Cold Delivery Dtpa Edta Function recovery Needle Reconstruction Syringe Ycl3
Type of PET scanner (vendor, model, crystal material)
Reconstruction method (with or without time-of-flight (ToF) and resolution recovery (RR))
dependent variables
Measurement of the PET phantom volume and the delivered 90Y solution
control variables
Experimental protocol (NEMA 2007/IEC 2008 PET Body Phantom, volume of 10 L, cold solid insert, 6 fillable spheres of various diameters, 8:1 sphere-to-background ratio with 90Y-chloride)
Measurement of residual activity in the vial, needle, and syringe
controls
Positive control: NEMA 2007/IEC 2008 PET Body Phantom with known properties and configuration
Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required