For axonal quantification of the cross-sections stained using anti-NF and anti-MBP, QuPath version 0.3.0 was used (Bankhead et al., 2017 (link)). NF-positive axons were detected using the cell detection module. Subsequently, object classification via a single measurement classifier was used to classify MBP-positive axons by thresholding for mean MBP intensity in a 1 μm encircling each single axon.
Automated Axon Quantification in Nerve Samples
For axonal quantification of the cross-sections stained using anti-NF and anti-MBP, QuPath version 0.3.0 was used (Bankhead et al., 2017 (link)). NF-positive axons were detected using the cell detection module. Subsequently, object classification via a single measurement classifier was used to classify MBP-positive axons by thresholding for mean MBP intensity in a 1 μm encircling each single axon.
Corresponding Organization : Medical University of Vienna
Other organizations : Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, University of Basel, Imperial College London
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned.
- Quantification of axons within the nerve samples
- Identification and quantification of ChAT-positive axons
- Identification and quantification of NF-positive axons
- Identification and quantification of MBP-positive axons
- Variance between different cross-sections from the same sample remained under 3%
- Manual post-analysis correction of the falsely identified axons was applied to every single sample in all three cross-sections
- None explicitly mentioned.
- None explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!