Brain Imaging of Cleft Palate Cohorts

The first 47 participants (20 uAR, 11uIR, 16 iCL/P) were scanned using a 3.0 Tesla Siemens Trio MR scanner. Halfway through recruitment, the scanner was replaced with a 3.0 Tesla GE Premier MRI Scanner. The final 32 participants completed scanning on this scanner. Both scanners used a 12-channel head coil. The COMBAT harmonization method was applied to adjust for scanner-induced variation.^{43 (link),44 (link)}

Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link: Access Free Full Text.

Conrad A.L., Kuhlmann E., van der Plas E, & Axelson E. (2021). Brain Structure and Neural Activity Related to Reading in Boys with Isolated Oral Clefts. Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence, 27(5), 621-640.

Publication 2021

Trio MR scanner Premier MRI Scanner

Head Trio

Corresponding Organization :

Other organizations : University of Iowa

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Scanner type (Siemens Trio MR scanner vs. GE Premier MRI Scanner)

dependent variables

Not explicitly mentioned

control variables

Head coil (12-channel)
COMBAT harmonization method to adjust for scanner-induced variation

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!