Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. The paired series involved a comparison test used to assess duration of effectiveness, pre- and postoperative differences in nasal obstruction VAS, olfactory disorders VAS and pre- and postoperative differences in NPS. The significance level was set at 0.05 for all analyses. The highest NPS from both the right and left nasal fossae was used for statistical analyses. Student’s mean comparison test was used to evaluate the influence of factors potentially affecting our results. Gender, asthma or AERD, history and number of sinus surgeries, preoperative NPS, hypereosinophilia, cardiovascular history and diabetes were tested. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method to determine non-recurrence. The log-rank test was performed to evaluate the influence of factors potentially affecting recurrence.
Protocol detail
Evaluating Nasal Obstruction and Olfaction Outcomes
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Asthma
Cardiovascular
Diabetes
Gender
Hypereosinophilia
Nasal
Olfactory disorders
Recurrence
Sinus
Student
Surgeries
Vas obstruction
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Aix-Marseille Université, Institut Universitaire des Systèmes Thermiques Industriels, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Top 5 similar protocols
Variable analysis
independent variables
- Gender
- Asthma or AERD
- History and number of sinus surgeries
- Preoperative NPS
- Hypereosinophilia
- Cardiovascular history
- Diabetes
- Duration of effectiveness
- Pre- and postoperative differences in nasal obstruction VAS
- Pre- and postoperative differences in olfactory disorders VAS
- Pre- and postoperative differences in NPS
- Non-recurrence
- Significance level set at 0.05 for all analyses
- None specified
- None specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
Sign up for free or login to display all annotations
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!