This study was conducted in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Boards of participating institutions (IRB No. of the principal investigator: KHNMC 2017-10-009-001). Written informed consents were obtained.
Assessing Bowel Function after Rectal Cancer Surgery
This study was conducted in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Boards of participating institutions (IRB No. of the principal investigator: KHNMC 2017-10-009-001). Written informed consents were obtained.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University, Seoul National University Hospital
Protocol cited in 4 other protocols
Variable analysis
- No independent variables explicitly mentioned.
- Scores from the Korean version of the LARS (Low Anterior Resection Syndrome) questionnaire
- Patients who underwent curative total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma less than 15 cm from the anal verge
- Patients who had no stoma at the time of answering the questionnaire, including those who previously received stoma takedown (repair)
- Patients who did not undergo abdominoperineal resection or palliative surgery
- Patients who did not undergo surgery or examinations that could affect bowel function in the time between test and retest
- No positive controls explicitly mentioned.
- No negative controls explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!