A threshold false discovery rate (FDR) = 0.2 was determined to be significant for addressing multiple comparison issues (i.e., FDR = 0.2 or less for significance) (Genovese et al., 2002 (link)). Only among brain areas showing significance does FDR thresholding optimize the expected proportion of false positives (Genovese et al., 2002 (link)). FDR levels in the range of 0.1–0.2 are practically and originally known to be acceptable, as they have been applied in several neuroimaging studies (Genovese et al., 2002 (link); Molteni et al., 2017 (link); Gordon et al., 2018 (link); Yu et al., 2018 (link); Jung et al., 2019 (link)). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and MATLAB-based custom software (MathWorks, Sherborn, MA, USA).
Hippocampal Volume and Attention Correlates
A threshold false discovery rate (FDR) = 0.2 was determined to be significant for addressing multiple comparison issues (i.e., FDR = 0.2 or less for significance) (Genovese et al., 2002 (link)). Only among brain areas showing significance does FDR thresholding optimize the expected proportion of false positives (Genovese et al., 2002 (link)). FDR levels in the range of 0.1–0.2 are practically and originally known to be acceptable, as they have been applied in several neuroimaging studies (Genovese et al., 2002 (link); Molteni et al., 2017 (link); Gordon et al., 2018 (link); Yu et al., 2018 (link); Jung et al., 2019 (link)). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and MATLAB-based custom software (MathWorks, Sherborn, MA, USA).
Corresponding Organization : Ajou University
Other organizations : Seoul National University
Variable analysis
- Hippocampal rGMVs
- Visual attention-related clinical variables
- Auditory attention-related clinical variables
- Total intracranial volume (TIV)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!