For this analysis, age was categorized based on IMCI categories: 6 weeks–2 months, 3–12 months, and 12–23 months. Children were considered to have low oxygen saturation if a pulse oximetry reading on room air was ≤90%. Three growth standards were also evaluated: weight for age, weight for length, and length for age, categorized based on the WHO z-scores [13] . Tables of growth standards were accessed at:
Predictors of Mortality in Pediatric LRTI
For this analysis, age was categorized based on IMCI categories: 6 weeks–2 months, 3–12 months, and 12–23 months. Children were considered to have low oxygen saturation if a pulse oximetry reading on room air was ≤90%. Three growth standards were also evaluated: weight for age, weight for length, and length for age, categorized based on the WHO z-scores [13] . Tables of growth standards were accessed at:
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Epidemic Intelligence Service, Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, National Research Foundation, University of the Witwatersrand, Emory University, University of Washington
Protocol cited in 14 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Demographics
- Medical history
- History of present illness
- Signs on physical exam
- Growth standards
- Chest radiography
- C-reactive protein levels
- HIV disease classification (for children with HIV infection)
- In-hospital mortality among children hospitalized with LRTI
- Age (categorized based on IMCI categories: 6 weeks–2 months, 3–12 months, and 12–23 months)
- Low oxygen saturation (pulse oximetry reading on room air ≤90%)
- Growth standards (weight for age, weight for length, and length for age, categorized based on WHO z-scores)
- Chest radiograph evaluation (by a pediatrician and a radiologist)
- C-reactive protein levels (categorized as >40 mg/L or ≤40 mg/L)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!