After selecting 10 types of food with Chinese characteristics, a meal was prepared according to the common processing and cooking methods. The investigators were responsible for weighing and calculating the raw food. The main ingredients included rice, tomato, celery, mushroom, rape (scientific name: Brassica napus L.; Chinese name: you cai; a green leafy vegetable), pork, crucian carp (scientific name: Carassius auratus; Chinese name: ji yu; one of the most common freshwater fish in China), egg, orange and banana. The investigators put the food in bowls or plates, and participants estimated the weight of the main ingredients. Then, the investigators put the bowl or plate containing the food on the background of vertical and horizontal coordinates calibrated in units of length (scale with 1 cm × 1 cm), next to the common objects known in daily life (a 355‐mL aluminum can and a piece of paper‐packed gum). The participants then estimated the weight of the main ingredients again according to the pictures of the relevant ingredients in the auxiliary reference food atlas. Each person estimated the weight of a food twice, with and without the use of the auxiliary reference food atlas. The differences between the estimated weight and the actual weight were then calculated and compared in the subsequent analysis of the data.
Validating a Food Estimation Atlas
After selecting 10 types of food with Chinese characteristics, a meal was prepared according to the common processing and cooking methods. The investigators were responsible for weighing and calculating the raw food. The main ingredients included rice, tomato, celery, mushroom, rape (scientific name: Brassica napus L.; Chinese name: you cai; a green leafy vegetable), pork, crucian carp (scientific name: Carassius auratus; Chinese name: ji yu; one of the most common freshwater fish in China), egg, orange and banana. The investigators put the food in bowls or plates, and participants estimated the weight of the main ingredients. Then, the investigators put the bowl or plate containing the food on the background of vertical and horizontal coordinates calibrated in units of length (scale with 1 cm × 1 cm), next to the common objects known in daily life (a 355‐mL aluminum can and a piece of paper‐packed gum). The participants then estimated the weight of the main ingredients again according to the pictures of the relevant ingredients in the auxiliary reference food atlas. Each person estimated the weight of a food twice, with and without the use of the auxiliary reference food atlas. The differences between the estimated weight and the actual weight were then calculated and compared in the subsequent analysis of the data.
Corresponding Organization : Nanjing Medical University
Other organizations : Qingdao Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Qingdao University, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, China Banking Regulatory Commission, Peking University, Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control And Prevention, Nanjing Brain Hospital, The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Xian Yang Central Hospital, Second People’s Hospital of Huai’an, Xuzhou Medical College, Suzhou Vocational Health College
Protocol cited in 6 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Use of auxiliary reference food atlas
- Estimated weight of main ingredients
- Difference between estimated weight and actual weight
- Age of participants (20-22 years old)
- Type of food (10 types with Chinese characteristics)
- Preparation and cooking methods
- Presentation of food (in bowls or plates, with vertical and horizontal coordinates and common objects)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!