The study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards at each of the 4 participating sites and was registered at as NCT02594267. The study conduct complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and followed International Conference on Harmonization Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. All participating patients provided written informed consent and understood that study participation was voluntary.
Phase 1 Trial of Pralatrexate-CHOP
The study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards at each of the 4 participating sites and was registered at as NCT02594267. The study conduct complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and followed International Conference on Harmonization Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. All participating patients provided written informed consent and understood that study participation was voluntary.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Fox Chase Cancer Center
Variable analysis
- Dose of pralatrexate in combination with CHOP
- Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of pralatrexate in combination with CHOP
- Safety and efficacy of 6 cycles of the pralatrexate-CHOP (Folotyn-CHOP [Fol-CHOP]) combination
- Not explicitly mentioned
- No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned in the input protocol.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!