Dementia Prediction: A Binary Classification Approach
We formulated the prediction of dementia as a binary classification problem (dementia, control); therefore, evaluation metrics, such as accuracy, F1-score, balanced accuracy, precision, specificity and sensitivity, were used to measure the performance of the subsets of features. The following evaluation metrics were used:
True positives (TP): number of dementia cases that were correctly classified.
False positives (FP): number of healthy subjects incorrectly classified as dementia cases.
True negatives (TN): number of healthy subjects correctly classified.
False negatives (FN): number of dementia cases incorrectly classified as healthy subjects.
Accuracy (%): the proportion of correct classifications among total classifications:
where n is the number of total classifications per test.
Sensitivity (%): The proportion of correctly classified dementia cases.
Specificity (%): The proportion of correctly classified healthy subjects.
Precision: The proportion of subjects classified as dementia cases who have dementia.
F1-score (F-measure) (%): Harmonic mean of precision and sensitivity.
Rajab M.D., Jammeh E., Taketa T., Brayne C., Matthews F.E., Su L., Ince P.G., Wharton S.B, & Wang D. (2023). Assessment of Alzheimer-related pathologies of dementia using machine learning feature selection. Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, 15, 47.
No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required