Two pathologists, who were blind to patient data independently evaluated the TMA samples. The immunohistochemistry score was calculated by the sum of the staining intensity and the fraction of positive tumor cells as previously described (11 (link)–13 (link)).
Immunohistochemistry Analysis of NRCAM in PCa
Two pathologists, who were blind to patient data independently evaluated the TMA samples. The immunohistochemistry score was calculated by the sum of the staining intensity and the fraction of positive tumor cells as previously described (11 (link)–13 (link)).
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Southern Medical University, University of South China, Guangdong Medical College, Huizhou Central People's Hospital, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, University of California, Riverside
Variable analysis
- Antibody against NRCAM (1:100, cat. no. ab87427; Abcam)
- Expression levels of NRCAM
- Tissue sections of TMAs of the patients with PCa
- Deparaffinization and dehydration of the sections
- Antigen retrieval using a microwave oven
- Blocking of the sections
- Incubation with primary antibody against NRCAM
- Incubation with anti-rabbit secondary antibody
- Visualization using DakoCytomation Liquid DAB plus Substrate Chromogen System
- Independent evaluation of the TMA samples by two pathologists who were blind to patient data
- Calculation of the immunohistochemistry score based on the sum of the staining intensity and the fraction of positive tumor cells
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!