Fruit quality was assessed based on single fruit weight, russeting and skin blushing, flesh firmness (FF), soluble solid concentration (SSC), and titratable acidity (TA). Mean fruit weight, as well as russeting and skin blushing, were determined on an approximately 20 kg bulk sample per plot. Russeting and skin blushing were rated on a scale from 1 (no russeting/blush) to 5 (russeting/blush on > 75% of the skin surface). Flesh firmness, SSC and TA of apples were measured on 30 fruit of similar size taken randomly from each of the 20 kg bulk samples per plot. Firmness was measured on two opposite peeled sides of each fruit using an EPT-1R penetrometer (Lake City Technical Products, Kelowna, BC, Canada) with an 11 mm diameter tip. The SSC was measured with an Atago PR-101 electronic refractometer (Atago Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) using juice squeezed from the fruit homogenate at 20°C. Titratable acidity was determined by titrating the fruit homogenate with 0.1 N sodium hydroxide to pH 8.1 using a Mettler Toledo DL 50 Graphix automatic titrator (Mettler-Toledo AG., Schwerzenbach, Switzerland). The results of the TA represent the malic acid content, expressed as a percentage.
Evaluating Fruit Quality Parameters in Apple Cultivars
Fruit quality was assessed based on single fruit weight, russeting and skin blushing, flesh firmness (FF), soluble solid concentration (SSC), and titratable acidity (TA). Mean fruit weight, as well as russeting and skin blushing, were determined on an approximately 20 kg bulk sample per plot. Russeting and skin blushing were rated on a scale from 1 (no russeting/blush) to 5 (russeting/blush on > 75% of the skin surface). Flesh firmness, SSC and TA of apples were measured on 30 fruit of similar size taken randomly from each of the 20 kg bulk samples per plot. Firmness was measured on two opposite peeled sides of each fruit using an EPT-1R penetrometer (Lake City Technical Products, Kelowna, BC, Canada) with an 11 mm diameter tip. The SSC was measured with an Atago PR-101 electronic refractometer (Atago Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) using juice squeezed from the fruit homogenate at 20°C. Titratable acidity was determined by titrating the fruit homogenate with 0.1 N sodium hydroxide to pH 8.1 using a Mettler Toledo DL 50 Graphix automatic titrator (Mettler-Toledo AG., Schwerzenbach, Switzerland). The results of the TA represent the malic acid content, expressed as a percentage.
Corresponding Organization : Instytut Ogrodnictwa
Variable analysis
- Harvest time (23 and 26 September 2020 and 2021, respectively)
- Total fruit yield
- Fruit weight
- Russeting and skin blushing
- Flesh firmness (FF)
- Soluble solid concentration (SSC)
- Titratable acidity (TA)
- Ethylene concentrations in the core cavity of the control fruit (within the range of 1.5–5.0 μL L^-1)
- Control fruit (used to determine ethylene concentrations)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!