A descriptive analysis was carried out (means, standard deviations, quartiles, maximum and minimum values) for each variable. For qualitative variables, the absolute and relative frequencies were calculated. A paired t test was used to compare MME preoperatively and postoperatively.2 (link) The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to measure the degree of relationship between scores.2 (link) The statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS Version 17.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc). Considering the reduction of MME after HTO as the main analyzed outcome, for a power analysis of 80% with a 5% level of significance, a patient sample size of 62 was needed.
Protocol detail
Evaluating Osteotomy Outcomes: Descriptive Analysis
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Patient
Corresponding Organization : Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Top 5 similar protocols
Variable analysis
independent variables
- HTO (High Tibial Osteotomy)
- MME (Morphine Milligram Equivalents) preoperatively and postoperatively
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Not mentioned
- Not mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
Sign up for free or login to display all annotations
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!