This study uses clinically de-identified RHC data from nine patients with confirmed PH: five with PAH and four with CTEPH. Three CTEPH and three PAH datasets are from Duke University, and one CTEPH and two PAH datasets are from the Scottish Pulmonary Vascular Unit. Static data include height (cm), weight (kg), sex (male (m) or female (f)), age (years), heart rate (bpm), and systolic, diastolic and mean systemic blood pressure (mmHg) measured by a blood pressure cuff. The patients underwent RHC, where a catheter is advanced from the right atrium, to the right ventricle, and to the main pulmonary artery. Dynamic pressure waveforms are recorded in each compartment. The pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP, mmHg), an estimate of left atrial pressure, is also recorded. CO (l min−1) is measured during the RHC by thermodilution. All pressure readings are obtained over 7–8 heartbeats. Demographics are provided in table 1.
Patient demographics; group 1: pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); group 4: chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).
patient
PH
age (years)
sex
height (cm)
weight (kg)
CO (l min−1)
1
1
64
male
164.0
72.6
4.0
2
4
58
male
161.0
70.0
4.3
3
1
27
female
151.0
81.1
2.6
4
4
71
female
167.6
93.3
6.1
5
4
51
male
179.1
117.2
3.6
6
1
—
male
178.0
108.0
6.4
7
1
—
male
179.0
74.0
6.3
8
1
—
female
183.0
82.0
5.6
9
4
—
female
154.9
67.4
4.0
CO, cardiac output; PH, pulmonary hypertension. For patients 6–9, age was not included in the medical records.
Colunga A.L., Colebank M.J, & Olufsen M.S. (2023). Parameter inference in a computational model of haemodynamics in pulmonary hypertension. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 20(200), 20220735.
Systolic, diastolic and mean systemic blood pressure (mmHg)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required