Inhibitory Control Training for Binge-Spectrum Eating Disorders
We recruited adults with clinically significant binge-spectrum EDs (N = 63), including BN-spectrum and BED, from the community for participation in a parent trial of CBT-E augmented by inhibitory control training (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04076553). Participants were included in the parent trial if they were between 18 and 55 years old, experienced an average of at least one objective binge eating episode per week over the previous 12 weeks, had stable psychiatric medication for the past 3 months (if applicable), had a reliable Internet connection, and were located in the USA and willing and able to participate in remote intervention and assessments. Participants were excluded if they were not fluent in English, were below a BMI of 18.5, were planning to begin (in the next 6 months) or currently participating in another weight loss treatment or psychotherapy for binge eating and/or weight loss. Participants were not eligible if they had a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder or intellectual disability, were currently experiencing other severe psychopathology that would limit their ability to engage in the treatment program (e.g., severe depression, substance dependence, active psychotic disorder), or demonstrated high levels of inhibitory control (and thus would not benefit from the inhibitory control training portion of the treatment). Participants were also excluded from the parent trial if at least half of their binge episodes were composed nearly entirely of fruit/vegetables (i.e., 80% or more of the total food consumed during binges were raw fruits and vegetables) because of the intention to test inhibitory control training toward more traditional binge foods (e.g., pizza, ice cream). Participants were not eligible if they had experienced a recent head trauma, neurological condition, or brain condition that would interfere with completion of daily computer trainings. The current study represents a secondary analysis of data from the parent trial. For the current study’s analyses, participants were included if they completed at least one session of treatment. Of these 63 individuals, 11 (17.5% of sample) dropped out of treatment prior to completing all 12 sessions. Attrition rates in our study are comparable to rates in other trials of CBT for EDs [3 (link)]. Participants completed 10.48 treatment sessions on average (SD = 3.51). In the current sample, 29 participants were randomized to the “sham” training condition, and 34 to the inhibitory control training condition. Table 1 depicts participant demographic information, diagnoses, and BMI.
Participant demographics and baseline characteristics by diagnosis (N = 63)
Bulimia nervosa (incl. subthreshold; n = 27)
Binge eating disorder (n = 36)
Mean or n
SD or %
Mean or n
SD or %
Age
37.2
12.7
42.9
9.6
Gender
Male
1
3.7%
6
16.7
Female
26
96.3%
30
83.3
Race
White
21
77.8%
31
86.1%
African American
2
7.4%
4
11.1%
Asian
2
7.4%
0
0%
Multiracial
1
3.7%
1
2.8%
Unknown/prefer not to say
1
3.7%
0
0%
Ethnicity
Hispanic/Latinx
4
14.8%
3
8.3%
Non-Hispanic
23
85.2%
33
91.7%
Disordered eating behaviors
Binge episodes past 3 months
91.4
58.9
91.3
48.6
Compensatory behaviors 3 months
71.7
77.3
0.5
1.4
BMI
31.3
8.3
36.2
12.6
Fear of weight gain
GFFS 10-item scores
30.9
5.7
23.8
7.4
BMI body mass index, GFFS Goldfarb Fear of Fat Scale
Butler R.M., Lampe E., Trainor C, & Manasse S.M. (2023). Fear of weight gain during cognitive behavioral therapy for binge-spectrum eating disorders. Eating and Weight Disorders, 28(1), 29.
Stable psychiatric medication for the past 3 months (if applicable)
Reliable Internet connection
Located in the USA
Fluent in English
BMI of 18.5 or higher
Not planning to begin or currently participating in another weight loss treatment or psychotherapy for binge eating and/or weight loss
No diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder or intellectual disability
No severe psychopathology that would limit ability to engage in the treatment program (e.g., severe depression, substance dependence, active psychotic disorder)
No high levels of inhibitory control (and thus would not benefit from the inhibitory control training portion of the treatment)
Less than 80% of binge episodes composed of raw fruits and vegetables
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required