The Caucasian replication sample contained 718 individuals of whom 542 were recruited from the US and Canada (259 cases, 283 controls), and 176 from Europe (104 cases 72 controls). The Asian sample included 866 Japanese (433 cases, 433 controls) and 300 Koreans (128 cases, 172 controls). Finally, 277 African Americans were studied (133 cases, 144 controls). All subjects had given written informed consent approval.
Genetic Insights into Narcolepsy
The Caucasian replication sample contained 718 individuals of whom 542 were recruited from the US and Canada (259 cases, 283 controls), and 176 from Europe (104 cases 72 controls). The Asian sample included 866 Japanese (433 cases, 433 controls) and 300 Koreans (128 cases, 172 controls). Finally, 277 African Americans were studied (133 cases, 144 controls). All subjects had given written informed consent approval.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Other organizations : University of California, San Francisco, Technical University of Munich, University of Bologna, Charles University, Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, St. Vincent's Hospital, Tokyo Institute of Psychiatry, Innsbruck Medical University, University of Washington, Université de Montréal, The University of Tokyo, Northwestern University, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Haematology and Blood Transfusion, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Scripps Research Institute, Helmholtz Zentrum München, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Kaiser Permanente
Protocol cited in 11 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Population ancestry (Caucasian, Asian, African American)
- Hypocretin deficiency
- Written informed consent approval
- Positive control: Not explicitly mentioned.
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!