Efficient CRISPR Editing in Chlamydomonas
Corresponding Organization : University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Variable analysis
- Type of electroporator used (NEPA21 Super Electroporator vs. more commonly available electroporators)
- Genome edit rates using CRISPR/Cas9 after electroporation
- Transformation efficiency
- Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strain (wall-less strain CC-3403)
- Electroporation conditions (short electrical pulses, transient pores in plasma membrane, charged molecules in close proximity)
- Positive control: High-efficiency protocol using NEPA21 Super Electroporator (16% of transformants contained Cas9-generated mutations)
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!