Tumor studies were performed essentially as described previously (Yamamoto et al., 2000 (link); Gapuzan et al., 2002 (link)). 5 × 106 cells were injected subcutaneously into SCID mice (Taconic Farms, Germantown, NY). Once tumors appeared, mice were monitored 3× weekly and animals were sacrificed when tumors reached 2.25 mm2. All animal studies were performed in accordance with NIH guidelines and with approval of the Boston University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Soft Agar and Tumor Xenograft Assays
Tumor studies were performed essentially as described previously (Yamamoto et al., 2000 (link); Gapuzan et al., 2002 (link)). 5 × 106 cells were injected subcutaneously into SCID mice (Taconic Farms, Germantown, NY). Once tumors appeared, mice were monitored 3× weekly and animals were sacrificed when tumors reached 2.25 mm2. All animal studies were performed in accordance with NIH guidelines and with approval of the Boston University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Boston University
Protocol cited in 2 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Number of BJAB or Daudi cells (250, 500, 1000 or 2000 cells)
- Number of macroscopic soft agar colonies counted 14 days after plating
- Tumor growth in SCID mice (time to reach 2.25 mm^2 tumor size)
- Cell culture medium (DMEM, 20% FBS, 0.3% bacto agar)
- Incubation conditions (37°C, 5% CO2, humid incubator)
- Cell count confirmation (total cell protein assays)
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!