The population retained for the present analysis is a subgroup of the ‘Reference Values for Arterial Stiffness' Collaboration database’, described previously.19 (link) Briefly, this database contains patients and subjects having had measurements of arterial stiffness (PWV or local stiffness measures obtained from ultrasound echotracking) and/or measurements of central pressure, together with a full medical history on record. These were provided by 13 centres distributed across eight European countries (see Appendix for the list of contributing centres). Inclusion criteria also included the availability of a full set of documentation regarding the protocol and measurement techniques used for the assessment of stiffness parameters. Subjects were excluded from the present analysis if PWV measurement was unavailable, if they had an identified genetic cause of hypertension or secondary hypertension, or had overt CVD. Diabetic patients (either treated or untreated) and patients treated for hypertension or dyslipidaemia were also excluded. Subject data included vital parameters, BPs, and the recording of any relevant CV risk factor, CVD, or treatment at the time of measurement. Ethnicity was not reported in all data sets; however, subjects other than Caucasians were a small minority. Subjects were further categorized (Figure 1) according to the presence of additional CV risk factors (gender, dyslipidaemia, or current smoking). Dyslipidaemia was defined as total cholesterol >5.0 mmol/L, HDL cholesterol <1.0 mmol/L for men and <1.2 mmol/L for women, LDL cholesterol >3.0 mmol/L, or triglycerides >1.7 mmol/L. Blood pressure was measured according to the procedures of each participating centre. The values of BP are those obtained during the measurement of PWV. Methods for BP measurement may vary with time and within centres. Automatic oscillometric devices were used in more than 80% of subjects. Mean BP (MBP) was calculated from systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) as MBP = DBP + 0.4(SBP − DBP). Threshold values for CV risk factors were chosen according to the 2007 ESC/ESH hypertension guidelines.3 (link)
Flowchart describing the selection and categorization of subjects from the reference value database for the present analysis. PWV, pulse wave velocity; CVD, cardiovascular disease; BP, blood pressure.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: ‘establishing normal and reference values’. (2010). European Heart Journal, 31(19), 2338-2350.
Other organizations :
Erasmus University Rotterdam, University of Cambridge, Université Paris Cité, University of Copenhagen, Aarhus University, Ghent University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Université de Haute-Alsace, Inserm, Geneeskundige en Gezondheidsdienst, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Maastricht University, University of Manchester, Manchester Royal Infirmary, University of Brescia, Charles University
Presence of additional cardiovascular risk factors (gender, dyslipidaemia, or current smoking)
dependent variables
Arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity or local stiffness measures obtained from ultrasound echotracking)
Central pressure
control variables
Subjects excluded if they had an identified genetic cause of hypertension or secondary hypertension, or had overt cardiovascular disease
Diabetic patients (either treated or untreated) and patients treated for hypertension or dyslipidaemia were also excluded
Blood pressure was measured according to the procedures of each participating centre, with automatic oscillometric devices used in more than 80% of subjects
Threshold values for cardiovascular risk factors were chosen according to the 2007 ESC/ESH hypertension guidelines
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required