Trained vs. Untrained Youth Fitness Profiles
Corresponding Organization : Swansea University
Other organizations : Manchester Metropolitan University, Glasgow Caledonian University, Ghent University
Variable analysis
- Trained vs. Untrained
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Gender
- Health status (exclusion of participants with known cardiovascular, metabolic, kidney, or any other disease)
- Positive control: Trained children and adolescents who were part of a long-term athlete development (LTAD) program overseen by the national governing body (NGB) of their sport (Hockey, Football and Gymnastics).
- Negative control: Untrained participants recruited from local schools across South Wales and were not formally engaged in sport training outside of curricular physical education lessons.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!